Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies

v3.24.1.1.u2
Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2024
Notes to Financial Statements  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

9. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Lease Obligations - The Company leases its corporate headquarters. The office lease is for 4,902 square feet of office space and the lease term is for 84 months, commencing on October 1, 2020. The Company made approximately $22,848 and $22,847 of cash payments for lease expenses related to the office space for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The weighted average remaining lease terms as of the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, are 3.5 years and 4.5 years.  The weighted average discount rate for operating leases for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, is 6%.

 

The present value of the remaining lease liabilities as of  March 31, 2024 are as follow:

   

Operating

 

2024

  $ 79,658  

2025

    108,457  

2026

    110,908  

2027

    84,560  

Total lease payments

    383,583  

Less: present value discount

    38,837  

Present value of lease liabilities

  $ 344,746  

 

As of March 31, 2024 and,  December 31, 2023, right of use assets were $281,019 and $298,485, and related lease obligations remaining, related to the Company's office lease, were $344,746 and $365,712, as recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

 

Other  

 

PDN China’s bank account with a balance of approximately $184,000, at December 31, 2023, was frozen by the Chinese government due to the Gatewang Case. The Company has classified this entire cash balance as long-term restricted cash presented on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, NAPW, Inc., are parties to a proceeding captioned Deborah Bayne, et al. vs. NAPW, Inc. and Professional Diversity Network, Inc., No. 18-cv-3591 (E.D.N.Y.), filed on June 20, 2018, and alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and certain provisions of the New York Labor Law. The class is defined as “all individuals employed in New York from June 20, 2012 through October 15, 2021 by NAPW and PDN to sell memberships to the women’s networking organization known as the National Association of Professional Women and the International Association of Women,” excluding corporate officers, shareholders, directors and administrative employees. As it stands, the class currently consists of 164 putative class members and 60 opt-in plaintiffs.

 

The complaint alleges that NAPW (and PDN in its capacity as an alleged joint employer) violated similar provisions of the FLSA and the NYLL by (i) failing to pay overtime wages as required by both the FLSA and the NYLL, (ii) failing to provide accurate wage statements under the NYLL, and (iii) willfully violating both of those statutes. The Court, in an order issued on March 25, 2024, granted summary judgment against NAPW on the claims related to willful failure to pay overtime wages. The Court dismissed, without prejudice, claims based on failure to provide accurate wage statements under the NYLL based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court found that questions of fact remain as to whether PDN was a joint employer with NAPW. Damages remain unsettled particularly in light of the Court’s dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claims related to failure to provide accurate wage statements. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company recorded a $450,000 litigation settlement reserve in the event of an unfavorable outcome in this proceeding. While the Plaintiff seeks damages substantially in excess of this reserve (including unpaid overtime, liquidated damages and penalties), NAPW and PDN continue to adamantly dispute the amount of damages claimed.

 

General Legal Matters

 

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. While the Company believes that such matters are currently not material, there can be no assurance that matters arising in the ordinary course of business for which the Company is, or could be, involved in litigation, will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.